Skip to main content

Posts

Odyssey of Purchase of Agricultural Lands in Maharashtra

 Owing to its colonial heritage and the political affinity towards the agricultural sector in India, most states in India, especially Maharashtra had agricultural land laws designed to promote and protect the agricultural sector and agriculturists.  However, with India’s focus on globalization and the need to promote the industrial sector, the Maharashtra Government continued to liberalize laws in order to ensure ease of doing business in the State.  This article by Economic Laws Practice, which is a leading legal advisor for Real Estate in India , discusses one such change which had a major impact were the introduction of and subsequent amendments made to Section 63 (1A) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (MTAL) which was an exception to the rule where non-agriculturists were barred from acquiring any agricultural property in the State. The aforesaid provision was introduced under MTAL in 1994, allowing non-agriculturists to acquire agricultural ...

India in a Quagmire Over Digital Taxation

 On the 1st of July 2021, the OECD nations adopted a High-Level statement containing an outline of the possible solution to address the tax challenges arising from the digitization of the economies.  India, which is also a signatory to the statement, has been consistent in its stand to equitably tax the digital economy.  With the advent of the NDA Government in 2014, India’s pitch for accelerated digitization was evenly matched with its quest to tax the growing digital economy, primarily driven by the fact that despite being one of the largest markets, most of the technology giants did not pay income tax in India.  India’s first move:  While a consensus eluded the major nations on the appropriate manner of taxation of the digital economy, India, introduced a new concept called the Equalisation Levy (EL) in the 2016 Budget. India and Israel were among the earliest countries to unilaterally levy a digital tax on the foreign companies. India levied a 6% of digital ...

The Interplay Between CSR & ESG Norms: What India INC. and Investors Needs to Focus On

  Across the world, there is a growing demand on corporations to focus on sustainable development goals and strengthen the social responsibility of business. Working in sync with each other, while Governments are taking initiatives to bring legislative changes, investors also have started to value and consider such factors as key parameters for making an impact with their investment. The investors (such as private equity funds, venture capital funds, social venture funds, banks, financial institutions) are looking towards going a step further to not just focus on monetary returns but also achieve positive social and environmental impact. The impact of COVID-19 has already created ripples in the society to switch focus on various social goals. Against this backdrop, the framework in India has progressed significantly with increased accountability for directors, key personnel and more disclosures relating to businesses. A series of efforts have been taken by the Indian Government, on...

Duties of Directors of Ailing Hotel Companies

 Asian Hotels (West) Limited (Owner) was recently in the news on account of suspension of operations of Hyatt Regency, Mumbai. Apropos such suspension, the Owner has been beset by several challenges, one of which is the resignations tendered by the independent directors of the Owner. The independent directors have cited the financial crunch faced by the Owner and alleged non-compliances of applicable laws by the Owner. It was also contended that the Chairperson and other directors of the Owner failed to convene a meeting of the board of directors to discuss the financial condition of the Owner. This incident, coupled with the financial constraints faced by several hotel companies across the country, begets the question as to what duties directors have in such circumstances. With the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013 (Companies Act), the duties of directors were codified. Section 166(2) of the Companies Act requires a director of a company to “act in good faith in order to promot...

Draft E-commerce Amendment Rules: A Giant Leap for the E-Com-Kind

The Government of India circulated proposed E-commerce amendments to Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 (“E-Com Rules”) which were notified in June last year. The public comments on the proposal have been sought by 6th July, though in a virtual meeting held on 3rd July, 2021, various e-commerce players have sought extension of this time limit at least till the end of July, 2021 so that comments/inputs may be sent after deeper deliberation.   Each of the proposals suggested in the draft E-commerce amendment rules have far reaching implications on various aspects including how related parties, associated enterprises are regulated and banned from offering the products on the e-commerce entities’ website, the ban on flash sales or the ‘fall-back liability’ clause sought to be imposed on the e-commerce entity.    Further some of the proposals seem to regulate areas which are regulated by other regulations such as FDI Policy, Competition Act, Data Protection Regulatio...

Law Firm for Litigation, Arbitration and Dispute Resolution

  ELP has been consistently recognised as one of the leading Litigation, Arbitration and Dispute Resolution firms in India and recognised as one of the top 100 arbitration practices globally, by the Global Arbitration Review. ELP has continued its commendable performance in the Litigation, Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Practice. You should avail the best services from ELP.  Visit @ https://elplaw.in/practicearea/litigation-arbitration-dispute-resolution/  

ELP Arbitration: Update - August 2020

DELHI HIGH COURT HOLDS THAT THE PROVISIONS OF (AMENDED) SECTION 29A (1) SHALL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL PENDING ARBITRATIONS SEATED IN INDIA AS ON AUGUST 30, 2019 AND COMMENCED AFTER OCTOBER 23, 2015.     ONGC Petro Additions Limited v. Fernas Construction Co. Inc.1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND Vide an order dated September 25, 2019 (Order), the Delhi High Court (Court) disposed off the petition filed by ONGC Petro Additions Limited (Petitioner) against Fernas Construction Co. Inc. (Respondent) under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (the Act) and allowed an extension of 18 months (effective from June 24, 2019) for the arbitral tribunal (Tribunal) to complete the proceedings and render an award. Subsequently an issue arose before the Tribunal with respect to impleadment of the Respondent as a proper party to the arbitration proceedings. If impleaded, the proceedings would qualify as an international commercial arbitration (ICA) as defined under Section 2(1)(f) of the A...